Hi Everybody here is a painting and story of Man City Etihad Gods Gift and the 115 Charges against them, I hope you like it
My paintings, stories and videos capture fleeting glimpses of people places and social issues, I aim to bring my cityscape paintings to life in an expressionistic style, blending emotion, movement, and atmosphere to reflect the world as I see it, also turning negatives to positives in my way.
I hope you enjoy exploring my work, and please feel free to share your thoughts or comments — I’d love to hear what you think.
My Motto, BEE Positive.
https://youtu.be/6jvR3GhyGK8
Original Available, or A3 Limited Edition print £55 contact me https://andrewalanmatthews.co.uk/shop
https://andrewalanmatthews.co.uk/
andrewalanmatthews.co.uk
A Bit of History
Manchester City have been found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges brought against them by the Premier League for breaching financial regulations. The landmark verdict by an independent panel was reported on 25 September 2026. While the club's chairman, Khaldoon Al Mubarak, maintains the club's intent to prove its innocence, the case is now heading to a sanction hearing and subsequent appeals.
Story by Andrew Alan Matthews
Man City Etihad Gods Gift
115 charges they said
Yer cheats
guilty as can be
pep took the knee for thee
Man united grumblin
Bumbling about
Givin it some gob
“City’s on the Rob”
Smash and grab
At least were not drab
Man City’s Del Boys
wheelin an dealin
From the back of a van
At the Etihad man
Where you can buy one and get one free
Premiership
Champions league
FA Cup
Caraboa cup
EFL who can tell
We’ll appeal
And win
Grin
Its no sin
Cos Man United are the real Sinners
Devil worshipers
goin to hell
Its on there logo
Cant you tell
Cos At the swamp
They’l attack
City’s back
Ignore em
Score on em
Cos deep down
When the blue moon rose
At the Etihad
They took there last step
At the gates of hell
Devil worshippers
I can tell
Now Peps left the ship
in safe hands
they’ve got grands
As the Etihad stands Out
amongst the crowd
still winners
Championship winners
Grinners
Were no sinners
Gods Givers
Cos Under pep
we all had a ball
Drivin united up the wall
So they can attack us all they want
Rantin and ravin
Man united depravin
There cavin in
With the devil down below
Theyl try and have a go
Cos deep down
There in with the elites
On these man city streets
So lets get real
United Rigged the game
with Fergie time
Extra time
Bought the best players in dodgy deals
Back in the day
Referees Back handers
wangers
Man citys gonna appeal
Reveal
So when you here
The haters
Tryin to wind you up
Say whats up
Pep wound you up
Keep it up
Weve still got the cup
Gods givin gift
to ease the rift
Supportin City is a hard thing to do
Haven’t a clue
Its gods gift to you
https://youtu.be/6jvR3GhyGK8
Review and critique: Man City – Etihad: God’s Gift
Story and artwork by Andrew Alan Matthews
Your painting and poem work together as a single piece of football storytelling rather than simply an illustration. The painting feels like a crowded, chaotic snapshot of Manchester City mythology: trophies, supporters, the Etihad, Pep Guardiola, Manchester United, accusations, humour, rivalry and triumph are all competing for attention. The poem then provides the voice of the narrator—the provocative, cheeky, fiercely partisan City supporter.
There is a lot here, and importantly, it has personality.
The painting
The strongest characteristic of the painting is its energy.
You haven't painted the Etihad as a clean architectural study. Instead, you've turned it into a kind of football dreamscape. The stadium, shops, signs, players/supporters and enormous number of characters merge together.
The brushwork is deliberately rough and expressive, which gives the whole thing the feeling of a memory, a dream or a feverish matchday experience.
The use of blue throughout is particularly effective. It creates a visual identity immediately associated with City, while the reds scattered throughout the picture introduce the United rivalry. That red-versus-blue contrast becomes almost symbolic.
What works particularly well
1. The sheer number of stories happening simultaneously
There are little scenes everywhere. People appear to be walking, arguing, celebrating, selling things and generally getting caught up in the football circus.
That makes the viewer want to investigate the canvas.
It's almost like a Where's Wally of Manchester football—except the characters aren't simply there for decoration; many of them seem to be acting out the story.
2. The distorted perspective
The architecture isn't strictly realistic, and that's a strength.
The stadium seems to stretch across the picture while the enormous curved structure on the right almost becomes a theatrical curtain. It gives the Etihad a monumental quality.
You could describe the painting as expressionist football art rather than conventional football illustration.
3. The lettering
The hand-painted signs are important because they connect the artwork directly to the poem.
Words such as:
"MANCHESTER"
"CITY"
"WELCOME"
"CHIPS"
"FISH"
make the place feel like a real, slightly chaotic northern environment.
The imperfect lettering also suits the painting's raw quality.
4. Humour
There is a lot of visual humour in the characters. Some have exaggerated heads, strange expressions and almost caricature-like bodies.
That works particularly well with the poem, because the poem isn't trying to be a sober historical account. It's football banter turned into poetry.
The poem
The poem's greatest strength is its voice.
It doesn't sound like somebody trying to write "proper poetry." It sounds like a supporter talking directly to another supporter—and that's actually what gives it authenticity.
Lines such as:
"Man City’s Del Boys
wheelin an dealin
From the back of a van
At the Etihad man"
have a deliberately comic, Only Fools and Horses-style quality.
And:
"Smash and grab
At least were not drab"
is exactly the sort of simple rhyme that works as football terrace humour.
The poem also has a very strong spoken rhythm. You can imagine sections being shouted or chanted.
The central idea
The title "God's Gift" gives the whole piece an interesting framework.
The ending:
"Gods givin gift
to ease the rift
Supportin City is a hard thing to do
Haven’t a clue
Its gods gift to you"
brings the piece back to its central joke: supporting Manchester City is presented almost as a divine calling.
That's deliberately excessive—and that's appropriate because football fandom itself is excessive.
You aren't really asking the reader to believe the narrator literally has divine authority. You're creating a mythology around being a City supporter.
Where I think the poem could be improved
This is where you have an opportunity to make the work considerably stronger without losing its character.
1. Give it more structure
At the moment, the poem sometimes feels like one very long stream of consciousness.
That has energy, but some of your strongest lines get buried.
I'd consider dividing it into perhaps six or seven short sections, for example:
I — The Charges
II — The Rivalry
III — Del Boys at the Etihad
IV — Pep
V — United and the Devil
VI — The Blue Moon
VII — God's Gift
That would make it feel more deliberately constructed.
2. Some rhymes are excellent; others feel forced
Your best rhymes are the ones that sound natural:
"Smash and grab
At least we're not drab"
and:
"appeal
reveal"
The weaker moments are where the rhyme seems to dictate the sentence.
For instance:
"Now Peps left the ship
in safe hands
they've got grands"
"they've got grands" isn't as strong as the surrounding material.
I'd be ruthless with yourself here: keep the lines that sound like something a supporter would actually say and cut anything that exists mainly to complete a rhyme.
3. The poem could use a stronger narrative arc
You've actually got a story buried inside this.
It begins with accusation:
"115 charges they said"
Then moves into rivalry and mockery.
Then comes the Guardiola era and the trophies.
Then Pep leaves.
Then the City supporter looks back at what has happened.
Finally, the poem arrives at "God's Gift."
That's a story.
I'd make that progression more obvious.
The emotional journey could essentially be:
accusation → rivalry → triumph → Pep → uncertainty → legacy → celebration
That would transform the poem from a collection of football jokes into a more coherent piece of storytelling.
One important factual/storytelling point
The poem deliberately presents things such as the "115 charges," refereeing allegations and United's historical dealings as part of the narrator's football-banter perspective.
That's perfectly understandable in a piece of partisan supporter art, but if you're presenting the poem as historical fact, those statements would need much more careful qualification.
For example, "115 charges" refers to allegations/charges brought against Manchester City in the Premier League's disciplinary case; it should not automatically be rewritten as "City are guilty." Likewise, claims about referees taking backhanders or United "rigging the game" are allegations rather than established facts.
As satirical supporter mythology, however, the exaggeration is part of the point.
The Manchester United material
The United section is deliberately provocative:
"Cos Man United are the real Sinners"
and
"Devil worshipers
goin to hell"
That's classic football rivalry language, and the devil imagery works particularly well because Manchester United's badge famously contains a red devil.
The strongest artistic idea here is actually the Blue Moon versus the Devil.
That's much more interesting than simply saying "City are better than United."
You've created opposing mythologies:
Blue Moon / City / heaven / God's gift
versus
Red Devil / United / hell / sinners
That could actually become one of the central visual ideas of the painting.
Pep is probably the emotional heart of the work
The line:
"Now Peps left the ship"
changes the tone.
Until then, the poem is largely swagger and banter.
Suddenly there is a sense of an era ending.
You could exploit that much more.
The painting could almost be interpreted as a giant celebration of the Guardiola era, with the Etihad remaining after its central figure has departed.
That would give the artwork more emotional depth.
Instead of merely saying Pep was successful, you could make the underlying message:
"The man has gone, but the mythology remains."
That would fit your title beautifully.
The artwork and poem together
This is perhaps the most interesting thing about the project.
If the painting existed without the poem, I'd see it as an expressive, chaotic Manchester City street/stadium scene.
If the poem existed without the painting, I'd see it as humorous supporter poetry.
Together, they become something else: a piece of football folk art.
That's how I'd describe the project.
It's not trying to be a formal club history.
It's not trying to be conventional poetry.
It's not trying to be a photographic representation of the Etihad.
It's your personal mythology of Manchester City, expressed through paint, caricature, graffiti-like lettering, rhyme, football banter and exaggeration.
And that's where the originality lies.
A few technical improvements I'd consider
If you ever revisit the painting, I wouldn't repaint the whole thing. The rawness is part of its identity.
I'd instead consider:
- Strengthening one central focal point—perhaps the Etihad entrance, Pep, or the trophy imagery.
- Making a few important figures slightly larger or more clearly defined.
- Reducing some competing detail in the busiest areas.
- Making a handful of the signs more legible.
- Deliberately increasing the contrast between the blue City world and red United world.
- Giving the "God's Gift" concept a subtle recurring visual symbol—perhaps a blue moon, halo, rays of light, or trophy imagery.
- Keeping the deliberately rough brushwork. I wouldn't polish this into photographic realism. You'd lose some of its character.
The painting's imperfections actually contribute to its personality.
Overall critical assessment
Painting
Strength: energy, colour, character, humour and visual density.
Weakness: there are so many competing elements that the viewer doesn't always know where to look first.
Poem
Strength: authentic voice, humour, rhyme, football-banter rhythm and obvious affection for City.
Weakness: it needs editing and structural tightening; some rhymes and repeated ideas dilute the strongest material.
Concept
Strength: very strong. The combination of City, Pep, United rivalry, the Etihad, trophies, accusations and religious imagery gives you a recognisable personal mythology.
Most important suggestion
Don't make it more respectable. Make it more deliberate.
The roughness, cheekiness and exaggeration are part of what makes Man City – Etihad: God's Gift yours. The next stage isn't to remove that—it is to organise it so that the best jokes, images and emotional moments hit harder.
And I think the title is particularly good. "God's Gift" initially sounds grandiose, but by the final lines it becomes a joke about the strange, obsessive, sometimes painful privilege of being a football supporter.
That is probably the most human part of the whole piece.