To establish how the designer’s role within the studio environment is affected with the introduction of CAD, research into various design companies was crucial. This was achieved by conducting a series of interviews and questionnaires relating to the relevance of CAD in a studio environment, The accounts of these results are highlighted within the following Pages.
The studios that I have considered utilise the CAD workstation in various ways, from designing to re-colouring. This is demonstrated through research into Tom Lewis studio and accounts from various other Design related studios. The effects of CAD on the working practices of the designer and their use of CAD will be investigated. The effects of CAD on the whole industry is far reaching and I will try to analyse the state of the industry at present.
The affect of purchasing a system uncovers many varying aspects that affects the whole business and this study of CAD within the textile industry has led to a more informed approach to the whole process of design and production.
1.1 INVESTMENT IN CAD AT TOM LEWIS STUDIO
Tom Lewis studios based in whaley bridge Derbyshire is a global design studio, there main markets are the UK, America, Europe, south Africa and the Far East,
The company has developed enormously over the past four years concentrating on the wallcoverings and home furnishings end of the market. The products that they produce are split 50% wallcovering and 50% Furnishing designs.
This design studio purchased the first CAD system three years ago as part of its continuing growth. After identifying the importance of CAD they undertook an investigation to find the systems that best suited their company, they found that Ned graphics were the best for their needs. They purchased two Ned Graphics Delta systems and one Desitex VI. Following continued demand for designs created through the packages the company has just recently installed a further two Delta systems to meet continuing demand. (see fig 1) This highlights the importance for CAD within this company today and that they are utilising the systems to great effect, Indeed many design companies incorporate CAD as a part of their continuing growth.
Tom Lewis studio found that the system was ideally suited in creating complicated textural effects that repeat with ease. The CAD designer was able to embark on creating these innovative fresh design styles and freed the painterly designer from this restrictive type of design..(see fig 2 ). These designs would normally take an extremely long time to produce due to their nature and CAD can generate these styles with relative ease compared to the traditional method of production.
“One immediate benefit that CAD brought the company was that it gave a different looking product to the market”.1
The input of this design style immediately put Tom Lewis in a strong position for gathering commissioned work from customers. The accuracy and speed that the CAD was able to produce this type of design meant an increase in actual design output, giving more ranges and choice to the customer.
Tom Lewis studios now utilises the CAD system by producing the bulk of all wallcovering designs on the CAD and they have a huge library of designs held on the CAD data base that they can call upon at any given time for sales trips etc. This type of archiving is in common use today throughout the industry and this studio finds it an essential way of storage, Designs created several years ago can be stored and recalled with ease from digital data taken from optical disks. This is a quick method of gaining a design’s directory compared to the traditional way of finding a design and is an advantage for CAD. Designs saved in this way have the advantage of easier accessibility and can be immediately reworked or altered to fit in with a customer’s requirement.
The original ideas behind the investment in CAD have far exceeded the expectations of this company and continued interest is still shown from customers. This interest has undoubtedly added to the increase in computer generated designs in this company.
At one time Tom Lewis studios were the only company utilising CAD as a design medium, this gave the company a huge advantage in selling designs. Today many companies are following suit and have taken this medium on board as a tool for design creation, This increases the competitiveness in computer generated designs on the market.
This company is highly successful and is one of the leaders in their field in relation to CAD design and they are also one of the leaders in design studios today. One reason for this is that many manufacturing companies are only utilising their CAD systems for colourway production and rescaling designs.
Today most companies still utilise CAD as a colouring tool and do not want to take the initiative in designing on the CAD for they feel it may be too time consuming, or they prefer the traditional way of producing the design.
They also feel that the computer takes away the more laborious method of production, freeing the designer and enabling them to produce more traditional painterly designs. However companies like Tom Lewis have to be constantly aware of producing new ideas on the CAD to keep ahead of their competitors. What was once a new innovation last year is now just the run of the mill today.
1.2 EFFECTS OF INVESTMENT IN CAD IN DESIGN STUDIOS
Interesting similarities appeared throughout the whole textile and wallcovering industry through my research data. The findings found that with the input of CAD in design studios there was an underlying element of cost and time savings that are essential in today’s competitive market place,
One such company who I interviewed, Fine Art, displayed that if they employed a painterly freelance designer to reproduce a design in their Portmerion range, it would take anything up to two weeks to complete and cost roughly £300 for a printed wallpaper border and £650 for a repeating design of a size 640mm by 750mm. The CAD would be able to produce a Border and a repeating design in half the time it would take by the traditional way. This application and intervention of CAD frees the designer to produce more design ranges and is cost effective to the company.
Traditionally the studio or freelance designer would laboriously copy the design by the traditional method and a new design range would be produced. This method has to some extent been taken away by CAD. The major change has come about by the Computers ability to scan an original design into the system with complete accuracy and its capabilities are such that it can be reduced, enlarged, tossed around and placed onto a number of backgrounds in any infinite number of ways. This is an advantage for CAD in competing with traditional methods of design reproduction and I have found through my research that most design companies today utilise CAD in this way.
However it can be argued that you cannot replace the painterly designer and I believe this to be true, but the printed textile industry is fast becoming a computer orientated manufacturing unit that believes in cost savings. This ultimately leads to fewer designs being bought by the major companies like Vymura, Fine Art etc and makes selling designs increasingly difficult for the freelance designer and independent Design Company like Tom Lewis Studios. This is one direct result from the use of CAD in many design companies and is a disadvantage for the freelance designer when selling their designs on the market.
Nevertheless the industry still requires the services of independent designers to inject a variety of different handwriting of design to their portfolio. A company recognizes the value of the freelance designer and that they give added strength to them, they also ensure that the studio does not become stagnant.
“The CAD designer has to be more efficient than a painterly designer due to the costs of training and machinery, whereas all the painterly designer has to contend with is a box of paints and paper and their artistic flair.”2
Although this comment is subjective and is in favour for the CAD designer it indicates that speed and efficiency is an essential ingredient in the CAD design process. The CAD design process is affected by the time allowed on a specific design. The rate at which a CAD designer can produce a design according to Tom Lewis studio should be about 50% faster than a painterly designer and this rate of speed normally increases to roughly 80% before sales trips and exhibitions.
The importance of maintaining a high level of design output from the CAD designer is of utmost importance to balance a company’s finances in design creation. Tom Lewis studio has realised that;
“The studio encourages the designers to interchange the skills allowing a flexible workforce. But the tendency is to stick with the designers specialising in their areas. This is due to the fact that productivity has to stay at a constant level and you have to get the most out of the CAD for it to be able to run at a budget and to the deadlines.”3
The running costs of CAD are extremely important in the management side of the business and the hidden costs such as maintenance contracts to keep all the machinery running are essential. Fine Décor has compared the overall cost to the traditional method of production and they have found it to be about 50% more efficient in costs and about 60% more time saving
Companies like Fine Art find that they are able to produce more designs from the designers that they employ, This is due to the freedom that CAD offers the designer. The laborious tasks like re-colouring a design is now produced through the CAD and enables the designer to be more articulate in their choice of colour. (see fig 3)
“It is important to remember that CAD is a tool for an expert to enhance their specific part of the process and add to the overall success of the business. If we let the skills disappear, the technology will have little on which to base developments.”4
What this comment underlines is the issues surrounding CAD and its usage, it is true to say that if there is no creative input from a designer the developments in CAD software become pointless. It is essential that the Designer is included as a part of developing a package for the designer, in the past this was not the case and they were excluded from any decision making. However today the input of the designer is a fundamental element in producing a design package for the printed textile market, This is realised by Ned Graphics and they develop their software to the requirements of the designer.
The software packages on offer ten years ago were not as easy to use for the printed textile designer and the packages were based upon the computer expert’s view of how a design package should operate. This resulted in a package that was not really suitable for the printed textile market and there were limitations to the output of artwork and usability of the software. The design packages of yesteryear were more suitable for Draughtsmanship and woven textiles, which were based on more linear drawing styles. These packages resulted in the printed textile designer being unenthusiastic to the usage of CAD in design.
However today this is changing, the systems have now become extremely user friendly to the printed textile designer and is changing the designers view of CAD today. Designers of the past were reluctant to use CAD as a design tool, but today they are now eager to take the initiative and use CAD as a tool for the design process. This is highlighted by the increase in investment in CAD workstations throughout the industry today.
“A few years ago draughtsman were happy to work with pencils and rulers; nowadays those who don’t know their way around an AutoCAD or some such programme are very few and far between”5
One other benefit for CAD is that the designer can gain a representation of the design’s separation. The CAD can separate a design’s colour into individual screens and can be either viewed on screen or printed out for the customer. This was not available to the designer before the introduction of CAD and the design would normally go to production before a customer could see a sample of cloth. Customers like to see the engraved screens in order to assess what they are getting for their money and speeds up the process of approval.
However the quality of the screens produced by this process are of a low standard compared to the traditional method, nevertheless they give a representation of what they may look like and are perfect for customers to gain an idea of what the finished article will look like. Companies like Vanguard, who caters for the low end of the market, would often use these separated screens for their final separations. Companies such as this find CAD an ideal tool in these situations and are often not interested in gaining a quality product. In this instance the cost savings are the most important aspect that CAD has brought this low end of the market company.
1.3 CAD Training
A question arises to the relevance of CAD training throughout the industry and the freelance designer should not be overlooked. The need for training is not as essential to the freelance designer unless they are actually going to purchase a system and compete with creating computer generated designs. Although a designer needs to be aware of the relevance of CAD within their creative field and that CAD can aid their process of design by its speed of manipulation and colouration. The freelancer can effectively utilise CAD as a tool for design and sell that information on optical disk to a company.
With these factors in mind I believe training is important to develop designers for the future and CAD should be included as a part of that design process.
In my opinion in order to gain training for new designers, more investment by Universities is needed and time should be given to accommodate a training package for new designers. The software used in Universities should reflect the same packages used in industry. Although Manchester University does have a good CAD department and has a Desitex 6 system installed, they nevertheless do not accommodate the latest software packages such as Delta designer, which most of the printed textile industry uses. The training on CAD systems today is left almost entirely to a company who has invested in CAD.
However it is realised that the view of most design companies is that they will provide training to the people they employ and that CAD training for new designers is not as essential as design training. Although it is of my opinion that CAD training is also important in today’s competitive market and the CAD trained designer is at a further advantage when facing employment within a CAD orientated studio.
New designers emerging from Universities are at a disadvantage to the industrially trained CAD designer, for they are given minimal training on CAD systems and are not equipped to cope with the demands of CAD in the industry as yet. This is understandable because of lack of resources and the programme of study time. But I believe that this problem needs to be addressed in order to create more competent CAD designers for the future, indeed the input of CAD to the traditional designer would be advantageous to both new and old designer for it enables more scope for creative thinking and working.
I believe in the future CAD will play a greater role for designers and the freelancer will need to invest in CAD, they will also have to review the way they work in order to compete. Training will also have to be undertaken by the freelancer.
.
I approached Mr P Bowman of Ned Graphics and asked the question. Do you provide training to people?
“We supply training as a part of the installation of the equipment and it is built into the system, Additional training costs £250-£400 per day. We do not provide tuition to independent designers because we are not geared up to doing it at all, this is because the biggest chunk of investment is development. We do offer additional training to our customer base but to people with no systems it has a limited value to us”6
This highlights the dilemma to the new designer, generally employers require more competent designers than before to enhance their business.and to gain training on a CAD system that textile companies use today is extremely difficult.
I asked the question is their any way of gaining training for the freelancer?
“There are freelance trainers about who we use on occasions who would be pleased to do it, but are not cheap”7
This is an indication of the state of the training industry at present and that there is indeed a need for a recognised institution to take up the challenge of giving designers the training required on such industrially based systems.
1.4 DESIGN WITH CAD
The understanding of a Designer’s occupational responsibilities to the process of design has to be given careful consideration in relation to the input of CAD. Today the role of the designer has, and is being affected by, its interaction of artwork on the system.
A survey of how CAD has affected the designer was undertaken by myself, this was achieved by a series of questionnaires and interviews,
And when evaluated it uncovered specific areas that affected the designers use of CAD.
95% of designers employed by a company found that the system had given them the desired requirements that they needed in terms of manipulation, whilst the remainder found either the software they used, hard to use or more restrictive.
98% of designer’s replies found that the areas of scale changes were very good and the remainder found the system they use to be lacking good scale changes.
90% of designers found that colour manipulation was excellent for their needs whilst the remainder found a need for small improvements. Indeed most designers employed by a company showed an enthusiastic response to CAD as a tool for the design process. However the questionnaire uncovered that dependent upon what system the designer used depends upon how the designer reacts to CAD.
Successful design creation varies from company to company and how they utilise CAD also varies, each individual company therefore requires certain elements from CAD to achieve an end goal. They all however have a common ground, CAD design has to give colour accuracy and good manipulative qualities. Most CAD designers who I interviewed or returned my questionnaire found CAD to be excellent and was an essential part of the process of printed textile design.
I asked the question, How good is the manipulative abilities of CAD?
“The CAD system is extremely easy to manipulate for repeats and to generate textures and background effects. We generally use the system to scan a design idea into it and manipulate that. Rather than actually design with the CAD, it is far simpler to scan a design into the system and produce various colourways, generate room settings etc.”8
This highlights that Design creation is best undertaken with an original idea, it is extremely rare that a company would design straight on CAD, however generating checks is one example of design creation straight on CAD, this is more suitably used with woven design.
At Tom Lewis Studio the CAD designer would start off with a line drawing which is firstly drawn out by the painterly designer, textures would then either be scanned in or recalled from the archives that are stored on optical disks. When creating a textural design the painterly designer would create the original texture by hand and scan it into the CAD.
Designing would begin and a sort of layering process is undertaken using the many functions installed on the system. Creating a design from the texture libraries in this way is extremely fast and accurate compared to the traditional method of design creation and is an advantage for CAD.
My findings have found that design creation on CAD is restricted to certain designs which can be created with ease, these designs as stated above are easily produced, but an input of some form or another is still essential in the design process. You can create designs with no input from outside sources by the use of a light pen, which recreates a number of different tools such as a brush, pen and airbrush but these tools are often used in conjunction with already scanned in material.
“Virtually anything can be scanned in to give a design idea. It is extremely rare that the studio would draw something on the CAD, it would take too long to produce something that way, due to the expense of the CAD it has got to produce a lot of designs very quickly.”9
The design process on CAD is linked to expense in an important way and this statement highlights the reason why most companies do not produce designs created straight on the system. I believe this shows that cost and time within a company restrict innovative design.
The future of design creation solely by CAD with no input may lie with the freelance designer who has not got the restrictions of a company who dictates the use of CAD. These designers may begin to produce innovative designs exclusively by CAD alone.
Today companies are reluctant to pursue a design that has been produced directly from the computer with virtually no input from outside sources, they believe that the painterly designer’s hand will never be replaced by a CAD design and that the proper use of CAD is being adhered to already.
Hopefully in the future these practises will be overcome and a more open-minded approach to design will be made. Designers like Mr J Dedman an ex Textile Design student at Manchester University who is now a freelance designer utilising CAD, has shown that his method of design can be both visually appealing and maintain quality in design by manipulation entirely by the use of CAD (see fig 4)
“Design is changing, and the role of designers is also changing.”10
Although CAD is an amazingly beneficial tool in today’s workplace these approaches to design will have an effect upon designer’s perspectives on design and will optimistically lead to a different looking product for printed textiles.
1.5 The freelance designer and CAD
The freelance designer has to be recognised within the design industry as a fundamental part of design input and they need to be given the credit that they deserve. They are often the most innovative in terms of design creation and their place within a CAD orientated environment needs to be looked at in more detail.
The designer working in a studio environment differs to that of a freelance designer, The studio designer undertakes briefings from managers and clients and work within a team, they also benefit from gaining the latest marketing and seasonal prediction information which benefits the design process by gaining informed design decisions.
The freelancers work independently and rely upon their own marketing predictions, Although in some instances they may gain information from companies who commission their work. The amount of work produced in comparison can vary, but on average the studio-based designer is more likely to be working on a design with the use of CAD in one form or another throughout his time employed.
The freelancer can effectively choose for himself the time he wishes to work., Although they may often have to work longer hours than a studio based designer and there are no strict rules that govern the allocation of a designer’s time in a given week for the freelancer.
The freelance designer normally has little contact with CAD unless they have specifically purchased a system and their time is mainly spent on creating painterly designs.
“How much actual designing he (the designer) does depends very much on the size of the studio, and the talents and capabilities of the designer”11
Although not all designers are in constant touch with CAD there has been a shift towards more integration with the designers and CAD. This integration of CAD design into the workplace has effectively changed the way of producing and purchasing certain types of designs.
“If we produce a collection we spend about £10000 on artwork, if we do it on CAD it would cost about £2000”12
This reduction in costs is because the company would purchase fewer designs and create the co-ordinating ranges by scanning the original artwork into the system and producing the collection from that. The freelance designer becomes increasingly disadvantaged to this approach and they are realising that the market place is unsympathetic to their situation
:“ The freelance designer will find it increasingly more difficult to sell designs, because as a company with the input of CAD we produce more designs anyway, reducing the need for buying in more designs or sending out commissions to designers”13
This highlights the immediate effects on the freelance designer and independent companies like Tom Lewis and Artwork Design who are in competition to gain a share of the market in selling designs. This is a disadvantage to the freelance designers with less artwork being available to them and this may lead to the weaker designer abandoning that career.
“We have had to let a number of people go due to the investment in CAD, you cannot expect to invest in equipment and have the same amount of personnel”14
This fact within this studio has helped to increase the vulnerability of the designer and only helps undermine a designer’s worth within the industry today. In my opinion the loss of skilled workers only increases the lack of creative input within a company and leads to a stagnation of innovative design. However it is realised that this process of elimination may have an effect of achieving resilient and dynamic designers for the future, this could be a positive aspect and needs further investigation in the future.
CAD is proving its worth within a company by its cost and time- savings. Nevertheless I believe that the effects on the freelance designer will become so acute that they will not be able to compete in selling their artwork or simply become disheartened by the lack of work available.
I believe in this instance CAD is a major disadvantage to the freelance designer but is positive for a company who can exploit design to the maximum.
1.6 DESIGN MARKETING,
The process of design follows a route from design ideas through to production and are fundamentally linked to the whole design industry, whether it be the designers role or the production methods of recreating a design to the marketing of a product.(see fig 5)
It is important to realise that design today is not exclusively in the hands of the designer. Information has been gathered from all sectors of the design industry from colour predictions, design themes and sales information. This helps predict the next season’s collections and aid the designer to informed decisions. Competitiveness in this industry is fierce with this fact and design has to be focused in order to sell.
Today competitiveness is not restricted to the UK markets it is reflected world-wide. This is shown in the interest to shows such as Intohome, Indigo and Heimtex, where designers and buyers converge to assess and purchase designs from around the world. Interaction between buyers and Designers at this stage is crucial to gain more informed design decisions.
“A picture is worth a thousand words. A visual image that bears a close resemblance to the finished product enhances the communication between designers and buyers, between sales and marketing, between buyers and stores and within departments and organisations”15
Design companies all competing to sell are increasingly aware that design today has to be of a higher standard in order to sell, and are aware that on average a design is often sold at a lesser price than it should be valued. At shows, like Intohome, when buyers purchase designs they look for quality, colour, design-style and how much they can buy the design for. They will often be swayed to a purchase if they can get discounts on a bulk buy.
This reflects the state of the market in design today. Designers are therefore under constant pressure to produce quality designs at budget prices and the value of a design has decreased with this attitude. This depreciation of a Designs worth is a reflection of the state of the market at present.
Designing today is market orientated, market research is undertaken to gauge what is the likely design style for the coming season. It is useless trying to design something that will not be relevant to a market area and the design will not be used, this is often the attitude of most design companies today
“ At one time the customers would look around for a design for something they can use, but now it is more market orientated”16
Buyers are aware of market research and their judgement on purchasing a design is based on these predictions. Most companies have cut down on expense and are choosy in what they buy. This means the designer has to be more in tune with what a company wants in order to sell their design.
The marketing of a design has to be considered as an essential part of selling in the design business and the use of CAD utilising presentation packages to increase the saleability of a product needs to be highlighted.
These packages increase the salesman’s selling power by displaying the design in a environment without the need to go to the expense of doing room set ups which can run into thousands of pounds.(see fig 6) With CAD you can produce roomsets in a matter of hours and the outlay is minimal. To create a true room set would take time and normally costs between £2000-£3000.
“Designs can be displayed in several ways; firstly on a high resolution monitor, where initial Design concepts can be rapidly, easily and inexpensively altered. Secondly printed on paper, generally for presentation purposes to support theme boards, but also to give a better impression of large images. Thirdly printed onto fabric by a thermal transfer or inkjet-printing route. This sample design fabric is made into garments for design buying reviews.”17
Companies such as Crown Wallcoverings find this way of displaying certain designs the simplest and most professional way of working and
find that this is the most cost effective way of portraying their design ranges to clients. Presentation is the key to a companies selling capabilities to prospective clients and CAD provides this by its application, Room-sets can be displayed on a laptop computer and several design ranges can be shown within this environment.(see fig 6) CAD in this instance has provided professional standards and quality coupled with cost savings and shows an advantage for CAD.
REFERENCES
1, Brown.P. Design studio Manager, Tom Lewis studio, Crown House, Bingswood Tradin Estate, Whaley Bridge, High Peak, Derbyshire, SK3 7LY. Interview date 25th 2nd 1998.
2,Ibid
3,Ibid,
4,Davies.R. Cad in the real world’; Using Cad Clothing/ Textile systems in industry.’ CAD in clothing and textiles.’ Blackwell Science. 1992. P104.
5, Pickering.A. (July/August 1991) Image Processing p.6.
6, Bowman.P. Managing Director, Ned Graphics Ltd, Synergy House, Guildhall Close, Manchester Science Park, Manchester. Interview Date 29th 5th 1998.
7, Ibid. P.3.
8, Byrne.G. Designer, Dorma, C.V.Home Furnishings Ltd, P.O.Box 7, Lees Street, Swinton, Manchester, M27 6DB. Interview Date 21st 1st 1998.
9, Brown.P. Design studio Manager, Tom Lewis Studio, Crown House, Bingswood Trading Estate, Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire, SK3 7LY. Interview Date 25th 2nd 1998
10, Diani,M., (1988) Design issues Vol.IV P.10
11, Albeck.P., (1969) Printed Textiles P.21 (Oxford University Press) London.
12, Barridich.C. Designer, Fine Décor, Victoria Mill, Macclesfield Road, Holmes Chapel, Crewe, Cheshire, CW4 7PA. Interview Date 8th 7th 1998
13,Ibid
14, Byrne.G. Designer, Dorma, C.V. Home Furnishings Ltd, P.O.Box 7 Lees street, Swinton, Manchester, M27 6DB, Interview Date 21st 1st 1998.
15, Walter.C., “CAD in textiles and clothing- a collection of expert views” Blackwell Science Ltd 1992. P.85
16, Brown.P.Design studio Manager, Tom Lewis studio, Crown House, Bingswood trading estate, Whaley Bridge, High Peak, Derbyshire, SK23 7LY, Interview date 25th 2nd 1998.
17,Perkins,P.E. Hands on CAD Casell, 1989 (1st Ed) P.8.